CORRECTION NOTICE, updated 22 September 2026
The instinct behind this episode is right: medical does not automatically mean GST-free, and clinics really do get audited over it. But the episode overstates one rule in a way that could have a clinic charging GST it should not charge, and it applies the wrong test to allied health. The audio cannot be changed, so the corrections are marked inline below. Where the recording and this page disagree, this page is right.
1. BILLING AN INSURER IS USUALLY GST-FREE, NOT TAXABLE. Section 38-60 provides that where the underlying supply of the health service to the individual is GST-free, the supply is also GST-free when you contract with an insurer, an operator of a statutory compensation scheme, a compulsory third party scheme operator, or an Australian government agency. Treatment billed to a workers compensation insurer is GST-free. The parties can agree in writing not to treat it as GST-free, but that is an election, not the default. The episode's general warning about third party billing holds for a corporate client such as a pre-employment medical, where there is no GST-free underlying supply for section 38-60 to follow.
2. ALLIED HEALTH IS TESTED UNDER SECTION 38-10, NOT SECTION 38-7. Physiotherapy, dentistry, psychology and the rest are GST-free where the service is on the statutory list, is performed by a recognised professional in that listed service, and is generally accepted in that profession as necessary for the appropriate treatment of the recipient. No medical practitioner needs to be involved at any point.
3. MEDICO-LEGAL REPORTS REMAIN TAXABLE, AND THE REASON MATTERS. A report written for a lawyer or an insurer is not treatment of the patient, so it is not a GST-free health service to begin with. Section 38-60 only follows an underlying supply that is already GST-free, which is why it does not rescue the report.
Everything else stands: the Medicare benefit test, the cosmetic distinction, the delegated services conditions, the break in the chain when a patient is referred to a separate practitioner, and the practitioner to practitioner report remaining GST-free.
Verified against the ATO's GST and health guidance, its guidance on other health services and on supply of services through a third party, and sections 38-7, 38-10 and 38-60 of the GST Act.
----------
Mia: Welcome to the podcast, our newsletter made easy. Please note, this podcast features AI-generated voices for your hosts, Mia Taylor...
Leo: ...and Leo Baker, bringing you expert insights from owner Ben De Rosa at Aevum Accounting. Each week we're here to help you confidently navigate the ins and outs of Australian tax, whether it's for your individual finances or the complexities of your business.
Mia: We'll cut through the jargon to give you strategies for compliance, smart planning, and that ultimate peace of mind.
Leo: So if you're looking to understand your obligations, maximize your financial position, or simply gain clarity on your money matters, you're in the right place. Let's get started with our review of the week. This week's review comes from Clinic Chloe in Balcatta. She writes:
"I run a busy GP and allied health clinic. For years, I just assumed medical equals no GST. Ben did a review of our Xero file and found we'd been incorrectly billing insurance companies without charging GST. He completely restructured our chart of accounts and saved us from a massive ATO audit."
Leo: Chloe, that is a terrifying near-miss, but what a relief! And it ties perfectly into today's topic.
Mia: It does. A few episodes ago, back in episode 35, we talked about the ATO's massive debt recovery crackdown, and what happens when you can't pay your BAS.
Leo: I still have nightmares about director penalty notices from that episode.
Mia: Exactly. Well, one of the fastest ways to end up with a massive BAS debt is to get your GST codes wrong, and nowhere is this more complicated and more closely watched by the ATO than in the healthcare and medical sector.
Leo: I'm with Chloe on this one. If I go to the doctor, I don't pay GST. So I just assumed the entire healthcare industry was GST-free. Can you explain how that actually works before we get into the traps? Why is my GP bill tax-free?
Mia: It's a great question, Leo. When the GST was introduced back in the year 2000, the government explicitly wanted to ensure that essential health and medical care remained affordable for everyday Australians. They didn't want to penalize people for getting sick. So they created a very broad, very generous exemption for the healthcare industry.
Leo: So what is the basic rule that makes it tax-free?
Mia: Rule number one: the core criteria. For a medical service to be classified as GST-free, it generally needs to pass a specific test. A Medicare benefit must be payable for the service. If Medicare covers it, the ATO generally says it is completely GST-free.
Leo: And what if it's something like physiotherapy or dentistry, where there isn't always a Medicare benefit?
Mia: Great point. If there isn't a Medicare benefit, the service can still be GST-free if it is supplied by, or on behalf of, a recognized medical practitioner, and it is generally accepted in the medical profession as being necessary for the appropriate treatment of the patient. [CORRECTION: that describes medical services under section 38-7. Physiotherapy and dentistry sit under a different provision, section 38-10, and the test is not that a medical practitioner supplied them. An other health service is GST-free where it is one of the listed services, it is performed by a recognised professional in that listed service or in certain circumstances their assistant, and it is generally accepted in that profession as necessary for the appropriate treatment of the recipient. The listed services are Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander health, acupuncture, audiology or audiometry, chiropody, chiropractic, dental, dietary, herbal medicine, naturopathy, nursing, occupational therapy, optometry, osteopathy, paramedical, pharmacy, psychology, physiotherapy, podiatry, speech pathology, speech therapy and social work. A physio does not need a doctor anywhere in the chain.] Because standard GP consults and necessary treatments fall under these umbrellas, patients almost never see a 10% GST charge on their bills.
Leo: Okay, so if the rule is that generous, why did Chloe almost get audited?
Mia: Because that general rule is so well-known, medical professionals assume it applies to absolutely everything they do. And that is the biggest myth in medical accounting. If a service isn't for necessary treatment, it is a standard, taxable supply, and you must charge 10% GST.
Leo: Give me an example of what wouldn't be "necessary treatment."
Mia: A classic example is elective procedures without a Medicare benefit. If a clinic does tattoo removal or purely cosmetic injectables, those are taxable. If your clinic's accounting software is just automatically dumping all your revenue under the GST-free income code, you are building a ticking tax bomb.
Leo: That makes sense. Treatment is tax-free, cosmetic is taxable. But Chloe mentioned she messed up her insurance billing. How does that work?
Mia: This is the most dangerous trap in medical bookkeeping, Leo. It's called the recipient of supply distinction.
Leo: Sounds very legal.
Mia: It is. To be GST-free, the medical service normally has to be supplied to the patient. But let's say a local employer in Balcatta calls Chloe's clinic and says, "We need you to do a pre-employment medical check on our new forklift driver, and send the invoice to our corporate head office."
Leo: The doctor is still seeing a patient though.
Mia: Yes, but the recipient of the supply—the entity legally paying for and receiving the service—is the business, not the patient. And because it's a B2B, business-to-business transaction, and no Medicare benefit is payable for a pre-employment check, that invoice must include GST.
Leo: Woah. So if Chloe just hits GST-free on that invoice, she's shortchanging the ATO by 10% every single time she bills a corporate client or an insurance company?
Mia: Exactly. And over a few years, that 10% adds up to tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid GST. [CORRECTION: this is right for a corporate client such as the pre-employment medical, and wrong as a general rule for insurers. Section 38-60 does the opposite of what the episode implies. Where the underlying supply of the health service to the individual is GST-free, the supply is also GST-free when you contract with an insurer, an operator of a statutory compensation scheme, a compulsory third party scheme operator, or an Australian government agency. So billing a workers compensation insurer for treatment that would have been GST-free for the patient is GST-free, not taxable. The supplier and the recipient can agree in writing not to treat the supply as GST-free, but the default runs the other way. What stays taxable is work that was never a GST-free health service to begin with, such as a pre-employment medical for an employer or a medico-legal report for a lawyer, because there is no GST-free underlying supply for section 38-60 to follow.] If the ATO audits the clinic, Chloe has to pay that money out of her own pocket, plus interest and penalties.
Leo: Okay, I can see why Ben was fixing her Xero file. Let's talk about the staff. Doctors usually have nurses or allied health professionals working with them. If a nurse gives me a flu shot, is that GST-free?
Mia: This brings us to delegated services versus referrals. If a medical practitioner employs other staff, like nurses, the services those staff perform remain GST-free, provided a few things happen: the service is billed in the responsible doctor's name, the doctor accepts full responsibility for the treatment, and the doctor is involved in the patient's care.
Leo: So as long as it's under the doctor's umbrella, it's fine.
Mia: Correct. But referrals are completely different. Let's say a GP refers you to a completely separate physiotherapist. That creates a clear break in the supply chain. That physio appointment is not covered by the referring doctor's GST-free umbrella. The physio has to evaluate their own service against the GST rules separately.
Leo: This is a minefield. I'm starting to sweat on behalf of our medical clients. Is there anything else the ATO looks at?
Mia: Yes. Medical reports. The ATO loves auditing medical reports because clinics almost always get them wrong.
Leo: How can paperwork have a tax code?
Mia: Because drafting a report takes time and you charge for it. The GST treatment depends entirely on who the report is for. Let's look at B2B reports. Say a lawyer who is pursuing a personal injury lawsuit asks a specialist for a detailed medical report on a patient, or a workers' compensation insurer requests one. The recipient of the supply is the lawyer or the insurer.
Leo: So, taxable?
Mia: Spot on, Leo. No Medicare benefit is payable, the third party is the recipient, and the report isn't a natural part of clinically treating the patient; it's for a legal or insurance outcome. Those reports are subject to GST. [CORRECTION: correct, and worth understanding why, because it is the test that decides all of these. A medico-legal report is not treatment of the patient, so it is not a GST-free health service in the first place. Section 38-60, which makes supplies to insurers and scheme operators GST-free, only follows an underlying supply that is itself GST-free, so it does not rescue the report. That is the dividing line: treatment billed to an insurer is GST-free, paperwork produced for a legal or insurance outcome is taxable.]
Leo: But what if the specialist is sending a report back to my regular GP? So my GP knows how to treat me.
Mia: That is a practitioner-to-practitioner report. Because it is sent back to the referring GP to assist with your ongoing necessary treatment, it remains GST-free. The patient is considered the ultimate recipient of the clinical care.
Leo: So if I'm
a clinic manager, I have to look at every single invoice, figure out if it's necessary treatment or cosmetic, figure out if the invoice is going to the patient, a lawyer, or an insurance company, and then apply the correct tax code?
Mia: That is exactly why Ben De Rosa is so crucial for medical practitioners. You cannot just use a standard, out-of-the-box Xero or MYOB setup for a medical clinic. Ben specifically structures the chart of accounts for his healthcare clients so these revenue streams are split automatically.
Leo: So the front-desk staff don't have to be tax experts?
Mia: Exactly. By capturing these nuances correctly at the bookkeeping stage, Ben prevents costly adjustments at the end of the quarter, stops BAS headaches, and ensures that when he prepares the company or trust tax returns at the end of the year, everything is bulletproof.
Leo: It sounds like peace of mind is worth its weight in gold here. If you run a clinic, you want to focus on patient care, not arguing with the ATO over whether a workers' comp report includes 10% GST.
Mia: Precisely. So to all the practice managers, GPs, and specialists out there: don't assume your software is getting this right by default. Get Ben and the team at Aevum Accounting to review your invoicing structure and your chart of accounts. It could save you from a massive compliance nightmare. Visit us at aevumaccounting.com.au to book a health check on your clinic's finances.
Leo: Thank you for joining us for episode 38, we hope today's discussion has provided you with valuable insights. Before we go, a quick but important reminder: the information shared today is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute specific tax or financial advice.
Mia: Everyone's situation is unique and tax laws are complex. For personalized advice tailored to your situation, we always recommend consulting with a qualified professional. Until next time, stay savvy, stay proactive...
Leo: ...and check those GST codes. See ya!